232 posts
Latest Posts by devil-cakes - Page 8
M-miss nami sir...
"the early 2010s were better" no they weren't. "hey soul sister" was on the radio.
There needs to be a blog called “Where Are They Now? Politically-charged Bloggers and influencers that mysteriously disappeared after November 2024.”
One Piece Crack Ship War - Semi Finals!
Propaganda under the cut.
Reishigi:
Vinsmoke x Swordsman That one cover page.
Reiju being a sapphic icon was already canon in my heart but the way she cuddles up to Tahigi in a recent cover illustration just convinced me further. Good for them, Tashigi deserves a badass gf and Reiju someone who will treat her right.
That color spread is very lesbian
All of the manga readers have seen THAT cover page, and the tumblrinas probably did too after tumblr blew up.
Reiju is definitely looking at Tashigi with lust in her eyes.
LETS GO LESBIANS! There was literally no reason for Oda to illustrate Reiju leaning down on Reiju with her tongue out like that, the both of them in short dresses while drinking. Reiju cradling her face…
Oda's personal crack-ship, apparently. He drew them in a color spread because apparently he had a vision that no-one else shared and he needed to let it out in the world. And honestly, Oda cooked with this one.
Oda drew all the propaganda I needed.
There is SO much chemistry in the colorspread alone, but if that isn’t enough to convince you, please imagine Reiju flirting in the exact same loser way as her brother. But for her somehow it works because Tashigi is an even bigger loser.
I think Reiju should kiss all the pretty girls and according to the 1108 cover Oda agrees with me.
I don’t know if you’ve seen the recent color spread but there was nothing straight about how Reiju was holding Tashigi. She had her arm around her and is licking her lips. Tashigi looks very flustered. I’ve now decided they are gay for each other. Just trust me everyone
Dragodile:
Crocodad
Luffy's divorced dads fr Dragon can't be around sand or else he'll end up taking about his ex to anyone unfortunate enough to be nearby On days that are particularly stormy/windy (if dragon has wether powers) Crocodile is in a mood They long for each other but their past and present complicates things The divorce was definitely messy.
Product of the inexplicably popular fan theory that Crocodile gave birth to Luffy.
Technically a crackship but it has the potential to be the funniest canon ship? X'D
crocomom theory elite. also they both have scaley names.
I'm so goddamn interested in their hypothetical divorce. Arguably, more than their hypothetical relationship.
Remember when this was the sjw website? And we all condemned rape/incest jokes and OVER examined shows for feminist or anti-feminist themes? Now every other person is a rape/incest/bigotry fetishist or MRA and I'm mutuals-in-law with people who actively use the R-slur and post untagged snuff porn fantasies as a joke.
And every single one of them always plays the biggest possible victim if ever confronted and will tell you that we're entering fascism because of man hating feminists who need to jack off "Puritanism". Which was like, anti-feminist. Checkmate, blue hair Oppressor
EDIT FOR TERVES, FEMINISM INCLUDES TRANS WOMEN AND TRANFEMINSIM
"what if the genders were reversed???"
they are. like an overwhelming majority of the time and you say nothing. get real or stfu
actual tears running down my face
I’ll never forget how Democrats genuinely believed that brat summer would make Kamala appealing enough to win the election
I do want to say - I think the "it's puritain to censor No Mercy" reaction isn't a result of people being "too sex positive", it's a simple lack of awareness of misogyny. It was clear from the beginning this game was a test from reactionaries. Like they told players to be "every woman's worst nightmare" and GamerGaters immediately jumped in, it's a little On The Nose if i'm being completely honest. Just inflammatory nonsense
"is it authoritarian and problematic to ban the steam game about torturing and raping your hypothetical mom"
*sigh* no, xander, no, your queer incest fanfiction on ao3 is not “subversive” merely because normies think it’s weird. you are simply eroticizing abuse and the nuclear family. that is the status quo. stop saying that. *sprays yall with a water gun*
"Women elsewhere have it worse," should result in the conclusion that there's a pandemic of violent female oppression that must be stopped. but somehow people come away with, "so we should do absolutely nothing for any woman anywhere."
“4chan is just a website” discourse right before those Nazis get doxxed.
Classic lmao
this really happened guys, the courtroom artist sent it to me, he said the whole court went wild too got the idea from @genomynt, here's the post!
Literally in what world would *kink* be the only thing absolutely exempt from critique and analysis. What kind of dumbfuck shit are you guys on. Don’t y’all jerk each other’s unshowered shit over how well-read and analytical you are? We both know you’re smart enough to know this point of view doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
Lady Gaga "The Fame" album cover raw/unedited photo by Pieter Henket 2008
Can artists STOP dressing up like religious figures just to be provocative? They are disrespecting all christians and yes, I am referring to Chappell Roan singing dressed up as a nun or Joan of Arc.
Stop it. Nuns and Joan d'Arc aren't your LGBT+ icons. They are religious women the first and a beloved saint the second.
it’s actually so fucking insane to me that leftists can hold the belief that white people, due to their socialization in a racist society, are all inherently racist to some degree and need to constantly be checking themselves and doing work to be actively anti-racist.
but those same people would be sending rape and death threats if I said that male people, due to their socialization in a misogynistic society, are all inherently misogynistic to some degree and need to constantly be checking themselves and doing work to be actively feminist, even if they identify as women.
im noticing that a lot of men are trying to deny that women are oppressed in today’s world. i had a male classmate disagreed with me when i said that girls and boys are treated differently during childhood, i could hear it in his tone that my feminist view bothered him. i responded that yes girls are treated differently than boys and one example is the way girls are expected to do household chores while boys are not.
hate how women being gnc is just her being normal and natural and human like not shaving hair, no makeup etc. but when a man is “gnc” he actually chooses to conform to another societal standard (wearing makeup, painting nails, etc)
The Morning Visitor (1967) Dino Buzzati
terminally online schizo rant incoming. “puriteen” is just what Epic Bacon Faillennials call little girls who are negatively responding to or critiquing the hegemonic culture of sex. as someone in this age group, i rebuke this part of my culture. the “sex positivity” mindset has simply entrenched male supremacy, rape culture, and the sexual subordination of women, because it flattens, obfuscates, and ignores how exploitation and abuse occurs. younger women and girls are contending with the fact that the predominant model of “consent” and “choice” are insufficient tools to assess sexual violence, and these concepts have been used to endorse said violence. liberal feminism has done nothing but condition women and girls into complying with male supremacy by eroticizing both women’s oppression and male power, and more and more people are unraveling this to the chagrin of the Epic Bacon demographic that pioneered this toothless ideology. “ruthless criticism of all that exists, ruthless both in the sense of not being afraid of the results it arrives at and in the sense of being just as little afraid of conflict with the powers that be”—leftists happily apply this marxist concept to everything except what makes them orgasm. curious and revealing, indeed.
thus, the “puriteens” insult is an attempt to shame girls back into compliance, to be silent about the terms by which men have sexual access to women, a grim reality they see play out on a daily basis both online and off. both the left and the right agree that patriarchy is compatible with the world they want to build or maintain, and as a result, the feminist insistence on the abolition of patriarchy is the most radical, most revolutionary demand on earth. women’s allies and enemies want them to remain in chains. hell, many women want to be in chains. unfortunately, your friends lied to you when they said patriarchy is right wing. it transcends the political compass as no one can imagine a world without it. leftists only oppose capitalism and wage labor and slavery and racism and queerphobia and imperialism and ableism and war and the prison industrial complex because these systems of exploitation victimize men. men are humans, women are not, so they find misogyny permissible. things are much worse than you think, milady.
and as a result of all this, leftists are not beyond calling women and girls sexually dysfunctional, crazy, or not sufficiently fucked enough for opposing their own sexual subordination. something is wrong with you if you can identify, even through millions of layers of progressive-sounding obfuscation and gaslighting, women’s sexual subordination. men who complain about having less sexual access to women are coddled, catered to, thought to be victims of a “loneliness epidemic” that can only be solved by women’s submission or else they can’t help but engage in femicide, while the women who oppose said submission are called “puritans,” prudes, hysterical, underfucked, fascists and insane. i can’t count the number of times i’ve said that actual puritans were not even anti-sex—they supported men’s sexual dominance over women. the insult is ahistorical, but its function is to cast feminist critique of sex as wrong by likening it to being right wing. the right obviously isn’t anti-sex either, nor do they take kindly to feminism. all of that is to say, “puriteen” is primarily a misogynistic silencing tactic.
under the strict regime of heterosexuality, women and girls will be cast as mentally ill if they have class consciousness. having class consciousness as a woman renders you the ultimate enemy that must be neutralized, because we can’t have women opposing their duty as property. if women became human beings, that would just upend the earth, destroying the foundations of society, which is exactly what I and my brand of girlypops desire. girls who are called “puriteens” may make analytical errors, as we all do, but they are met with so much hostility because they actually do attempt to criticize all that exists, including the sexual cultural that is objectively organized through male supremacy, and they do attempt to commit the one transgression that eclipses all other transgressions—believing that women are human. to that i say, godspeed, puriteens, become even woker, shake the table, do not be silenced by these geriatric gooners and their 50 gigabytes of furry inflation porn. critical support to all puriteens of the world.
we kinda cooked with "girls rule, boys drool" 🤔 boys DO go to Jupiter to get more stupider.