not on here much but if interested you can find me on Twitter as @botticelli4ngel :)
152 posts
art parallels jeremy lipking, federico zandomeneghi, serge marshennikov, allan douglas davidson, svetlana tartakovska
If you're a writer you're supposed to write a lot of bullshit. It's part of the gig. You have to write a lot of absolute garbage in order to get to the good bits. Every once in a while you'll be like "Oh, I wish I hadn't wasted all that time writing bullshit," but that's dumb. That's exactly the same as an Olympic runner being like "Oh, I wish I hadn't wasted all that time running all those practice laps"
That's Axl's energy
“My child is completely fine” your child wants to get their back blown by a 60+ year old man with a former addiction problem
Sobbing this is so cute
tell me you guys see the vision here
-- Guns in Black N' White ☆
the hangover: part iv
if i was a popular minecraft youtuber id just tweet "hey guys stop drawing shipping fanart of me and my friends/coworkers, i only fucked one of them and seeing me paired with anyone else is kinda weird and crosses my boundaries" and then i'd turn my phone off
crazy how maglor can be maedhros' wife and widow and side chick and pawn and entertainer and muscle and second-in-command and votary and confidant and knight and publicist and dream and challenge and addiction and responsibility all at once and his little brother too...
nedsei is the greatest thing imagination has ever gifted us
Interpreting Marius from an historical angle with consideration of the values of ancient Rome and Renaissance Italy is valid.
Interpreting Marius from the angle of the author’s intentions and statements about him is valid.
Interpreting Marius from the angle of gothic romance/gothic horror is valid.
Interpreting Marius from the angle of 21st century values and modern social politics is valid (and can be very interesting!).
Preferring one or several of these interpretations to others is valid.
Behaving like having/preferring a certain interpretation of a literary character is morally superior or morally reprehensible is, actually, a bit of a dick move.
And also, sorry to say this, but… the interpretation of a person who has read all available canon material about a character, will always be more valid than that of people who have not. If you want to discuss the books, you have to actually read them. And yes, of course this takes time, but it’s not hard to contextualize interpretations and statements with a sentence like “I have only read books x and y at this point" or even to say "I don't feel like I know enough to give a balanced interpretation on this yet."
Watched deadpool×wolverine yesterday😭💖
this was sooo sexy. to me.
Deadpool: I take it all back...the Honda Odyssey fucks hard! *taunts, signalling with two fingers for wolverine to get closer* Too bad you don’t, needle-dick.
Wolverine: Oh, we’re just getting started, bub.
Me:
what do you mean it wasn’t a romcom
I can’t stop watching this,, they’re literally fucking
please look at this graffiti my sister saw in paris
They should have fucked in that car
canon mlm rep be like "i like a boy..but im!?!? also a boy!? >-<??" meanwhile queerbaiting "when we're all done here, i'll buy a nice, big, family size bottle of top-shelf lube and i'll tickle your balls till you beg me to stop and even then i won't. i just won't do it".